On January 8th, the IRS announced that it was delaying tax filing your 2012 tax return until January 30th. However, certain forms won’t be available until late February or early March. This means that most taxpayers can begin to file their 2012 tax returns on January 30th. However, if you own a business or rental property, you probably won’t be able to file either business or personal returns until March.
How to determine when you can file:
- Did you start a business or buy rental property in 2012? If yes, you can’t file until March;
- Did you own a business or rental property in 2012? If yes, you can’t file until March;
- Are you a partner or S Corp shareholder in 2012? If yes, you can’t file until March.
- If you answered no to all three questions, you can probably start filing on January 30th.
Forms 4562 Depreciation and 8582 Passive Activity Losses won’t be ready until late February or early March. Just about every business and rental property owner uses Form 4562. If your rental property generates losses, you also use Form 8582. There are some other delayed forms like Residential Energy Credits ans Qualified Adoption Credits that might keep you from filing until late February.
Leave a comment or email me with any questions if you are unsure as to when you can file. My clients will also receive a letter with their estimated filing date.
I say this slowly for the Jets fans out there:
THE IRS NEVER USES EMAIL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Any email that you receive from the IRS is a scam. Don’t open it or read it. Delete it immediately. See this announcement from the IRS.
If it makes you feel better, you can forward the email to the IRS at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Here’s a great column from the WSJ about how Big Business has sold you out.
Strassel: Big Business Sells Out Small Business – WSJ.com.
I’ll have an update soon about how you can properly prepare your business for the fiscal cliff.
Make better use of outsourcing. Outsourcing and off-shoring have bad reputations perpetuated by folks who have no factual idea about either concept. Outsourcing is simply delegating necessary tasks to people or companies outside of your business. Off-shoring is buying goods or services from lower cost regions. Yes, both concepts can cost people their jobs but your job/business should always be your priority.
Does it make sense for you to manage your books, build your website, create your own logo, etc? You may need to perform a cost/benefit analysis to answer the question but generally speaking the answer is no. Isn’t your time better spent with your customers or growing your business or innovating.
Here’s an example. There’s a one person business in my building. He is a craftsman who works 10+ hours a day building things with his hands. Then he spends a few more hours at night and on weekends managing his books, filing tax returns and dealing with other paperwork. Maybe he needs a break from actually being productive. I’d like to think that his time would be better served making things that he can sell. He can find a decent bookkeeper for $12/hour. His tax returns would cost him less than $1,000 a year and he could probably get by at about $400 a year. I’m discouraged to think that he couldn’t find the extra business or cost savings to pay for these services.
Look to outsource any activity that does not serve your customers or grow your business. A short list includes:
- accounting, taxes, and payroll
- web design and maintenance
- social media and blog maintenance
- personal assistants
- lead generation (maybe)
- cleaning and maintenance, and
- IT services
Some businesses have also begun to off-shore these tasks. I watched a brilliant webinar where one business owner off-shored his personal assistant duties to the Philippines. I don’t have personal experience with these services so I don’t want to endorse them just yet. I get inundated with proposals to have firms in India prepare tax returns for me. They aren’t cost effective yet for me but the idea is tempting.
The whole idea of outsourcing is based on old economic principles of scale and specialization. If you find the right partners, you’ll definitely save time and money.
Occupancy is a fancy term for the cost of housing your business. It can include rent, property taxes, utilities, depreciation, maintenance, janitorial and so on. Rent is a major expense for most businesses. If you don’t rent or own your business building, move on to the next post. If you do rent or own your building, here are some ideas for saving money in 2013.
Yes, rent is always negotiable. Even with a signed contract, you may be able to renegotiate your lease and rent expense. Commercial vacancies are down in my area but there are still plenty of vacant offices and buildings. Landlords don’t want to lose a good tenant. You’ll need to have a valid argument for negotiating. Remember that you never get what you don’t ask for.
Reduce capacity. I keep downsizing my office in the same building. I don’t need three offices and a private lobby any longer. My first downsizing saved me $1,200 plus I negotiated to use the private restroom. I’m aiming to save another $2,400 this year my reducing my space and using a shared lobby. My landlord doesn’t mind because he can charge higher rents for my existing space and has trouble filling smaller spaces. Every business should always look for ways to reduce the amount of space they use. It can always be done.
Move. There are plenty of opportunities out there. Remember to calculate moving costs and additional marketing costs into any cost savings.
Share space. Find complementary businesses to share space with you. This takes patience but could save you some cash.
Fight the tax man. Property taxes are crazy here. If you own your space, think about challenging your assessment. If you rent, have your landlord fight the assessment. You might just get a break.
Shop around for lower prices on heat and electric. If your business is a heavy user, you may find some sizable savings.
Next Post: Hello, this is Raj from customer service.
I used to pay about $4,000 each year for telecommunications including internet. I also purchased a phone system back in 2005 when I hired employees. My telecommunication expenses were almost as much as my rent expense. My first Money Saving Idea for 2013 is cutting telecommunication expenses.
Do you really need landlines for phones or faxes? I cancelled by landlines and switched to Ooma for phone and Efax for faxes. I needed to buy the Ooma hardware for $99 and ported my phone number for $20. I pay $4 each month for the taxes on the service versus $60 per month for a landline. In two months, I recouped by initial investment. Efax costs $17 instead of $40 for an add on fax line. You will also need a scanner to send documents through Efax but my office printer already had one.
I also have a mobile phone. Wireless isn’t reliable enough in my area to only rely on my mobile phone. But I was able to reduce my monthly expense by $20 by negotiating the service.
I cancelled by 1-800 toll-free number as most of my clients don’t have to pay extra to call me.
I negotiated my internet service down to $50 per month from $70 by saying that I was leaving. Most internet providers will make a deal with you if you call them. You can also look into sharing internet with neighbors. It might not be ethical but it might be all you need.
So in 2012 I cut my telecommunications bill from $4,000 to about $1,700. I think $1,700 is still astronomical but I know that I made better use of the $2,300 in savings.
Next Post: Occupancy
Quickly, Congress passed the JOBS Act this year with a provision allowing companies to solicit investments from “unsophisticated” investors. Previously, solicitations could only be made to high net worth investors. The provisions were to become effective on January 1, 2013 pending rules to be written by the SEC.
The SEC has not written the rules yet and probably won’t by January 1. (I don’t know if that is a permanent link.) This delays everyone and everything related to crowdfunding. DISCLOSURE – I plan both selling crowdfunded investments and providing consulting to businesses wanting crowdfunding. I believe it will help boost the economy.
PROS: Small businesses requiring up to $1,000,000 in capital will have a new source for funds. Owners can cash out of companies without having to sell their entire interest. Ordinary investors can find new revenue streams and investment opportunities.
CONS: There will probably be a lot of con-men involved in crowdfunding. Most business ventures fail and ordinary investors may not be able to handle the failure and loss of investment. Congress will probably overturn the law once some crying Grandma appears on 60 Minutes with a sob story about losing her life savings.
Obviously, I’m in support of the law. I signed a petition here in support of it. I live in a depressed area that could use a capital infusion. I’m sure there are plenty of local businesses that would get a boost from crowdfunding. There are also plenty of local investors looking for a better rate of return than CDs and Money Market accounts. There will be plenty of hucksters (see .com bust and real estate bust). More importantly, there are plenty of good businesses and good business ideas that will benefit from this law.
This is not a political post. As I’ve said before, unions are great, as long as you already have a job. The recent change in Michigan to a right to work state will not hurt the private sector unions in the short-term and may help them in the long-term. This is a decent description of right to work. Basically, the law means that you don’t have to join a union to be eligible for a job. Michigan’s economy could use a boost. See ratings here. They also have one of the highest unemployment rates in the country (right behind my beloved CT.)
Right to work protection will help Michigan attract more business investment. Unions are one more hassle for a business to consider when choosing a location. My personal experience with unions is mixed. Some unions understand the need for flexibility while others shoot themselves in the foot, thigh and waist by being inflexible. But, in general, capital tends to flow to businesses that aren’t unionized. This means that investors will view Michigan’s business climate as more friendly. Companies involved in the auto industry may consider relocating closer to their customers in Michigan. Business may also move out of non-right to work states like Illinois and Ohio and into Michigan. Indiana and Wisconsin have had some success in poaching businesses from Illinois.
Increased business in Michigan will be good for both union and non-union employees. Union shops can stay union and continue to collectively bargain for wages, benefits, work rules, etc. Non-union shops can start or expand without the threat of the additional time and expense of negotiating with unions.
The result will be measured by a decrease in the unemployment rate in Michigan and increase in its’ GDP. As the law is effective on April 1, 2003, it may take until Spring 2015 to demonstrate any success or failure.